
The legal profession is structurally and psychologically grounded in dualistic reasoning—binary distinctions such as right/wrong, win/lose, liable/not liable. While indispensable to the functioning of legal systems, this cognitive orientation, when generalized beyond its appropriate domain, may exact a significant psychological toll on attorneys. This Article examines how early developmental reinforcement of intellectual achievement, combined with legal training and professional demands, can entrench a dualistic mode of cognition that shapes not only legal reasoning but also



